Tags:
A very inspiring talk by Sir Ken Robinson.
I have watched this speech several times and am inspired by the clarity and simplicity in which he presents his notion of creativity being as important as literacy. Very compelling.
Will it happen in the near future you ask? Depends on the politicians...... the ones that want our votes to get into power will have to put this in their plan!
Yes schools do kill creativity, but not necessarily the fault of the schools themselves, but with our 19th century way of assessing what and how children learned. In much the same way that we haven't moved into this century in looking at the school year (when was the last time your kids went out in June to plant the seed, or stay out until Labor Day to harvest?), so we have focused on learning facts. Well facts change or become obsolete. The method of assessing data and drawing conclusions, including thinking out of the box, is what counts. The US did not become what it is because we were all taught to think the same way. It is what it is because of our historical ability to create new business, new ideas, new services. History also tells us that many of those concepts and ideas were developed by the 20% of our kids that our schools downright fail because they "learn differently". Have you looked at Lego lately? What used to be a case of taking a few different pieces and using your imagination to create something unique, has now become a 50 page instruction manual dedicated to replicating the latest vehicle from Star Wars or Indiana Jones. Hopefully this will at least make us useful as an outsourced labor pool for the Japanese, Korean and Indian entrepreneurs of the future that are being taught and encouraged to develop new creative ideas in their schools today.
Sorry to ramble on, but I just coincidentally saw a talk by Dr Arthur Harkins of the University Of Minnesota on this exact topic. Check out his site at http://www.leapfroginstitutes.org/
Yes schools do kill creativity, but not necessarily the fault of the schools themselves, but with our 19th century way of assessing what and how children learned. In much the same way that we haven't moved into this century in looking at the school year (when was the last time your kids went out in June to plant the seed, or stay out until Labor Day to harvest?), so we have focused on learning facts. Well facts change or become obsolete. The method of assessing data and drawing conclusions, including thinking out of the box, is what counts. The US did not become what it is because we were all taught to think the same way. It is what it is because of our historical ability to create new business, new ideas, new services. History also tells us that many of those concepts and ideas were developed by the 20% of our kids that our schools downright fail because they "learn differently". Have you looked at Lego lately? What used to be a case of taking a few different pieces and using your imagination to create something unique, has now become a 50 page instruction manual dedicated to replicating the latest vehicle from Star Wars or Indiana Jones. Hopefully this will at least make us useful as an outsourced labor pool for the Japanese, Korean and Indian entrepreneurs of the future that are being taught and encouraged to develop new creative ideas in their schools today.
Sorry to ramble on, but I just coincidentally saw a talk by Dr Arthur Harkins of the University Of Minnesota on this exact topic. Check out his site at http://www.leapfroginstitutes.org/
I feel the same way about legos. It feels like preparation for an assembly plant. It is also very degrading. My son got a lego set for his birthday. He didn't even get the privilege of playing with it because my husband and my husband's friend took two hours to assemble it. Then, because it only works one way, my son doesn't even get to play with it. It is put on display. So, I keep a bucket of legos on the bottom shelf of a bookcase filled with manipulative toys and board games. My son spends hours creating spaceships, planes and trucks.

© 2010 Created by Errol Smith.